My 180 degree turn in the Uncle Lee case

For the detractors/PR bootlickers who would love to believe I've been bias against Puspa for a long time, as well as those on the fence because you don't trust that I really was initially neutral on the case, allow me to clarify again, with evidence, that up until just last month when I got caught up in Uncle Lee's case, I was a follower of Puspa and believed she was doing good work. On the other hand, when I first heard of the suspected cruel dog breeder, I was as pissed at him on seeing the conditions of his place and dogs through photos, as most people were when the news of the 'biggest and worst puppy mill busted by Puspa' came out. So actually, I wasn't neutral at all, I had already judged Uncle Lee based on the little I knew through the few photos taken.

And as you all can tell, I'm one who likes to back up my claims with evidence, so here it is.

As explained before, how I got involved was when a lady posted on a Facebook group for dog lovers asking for people to investigate this suspected cruel dog breeder. She mentioned that her friend has gone once to his place and ask if they could help reduce his burden by taking some puppies he had, although she did not mention how many puppies her friend saw, so I can only presume this was referring to the 4 puppies mentioned in my video. She said according to her friend, the 'breeder' agreed to let us take the puppies. I had no intention to take any dogs or puppies and just wanted to investigate.

These are the screenshots of the Facebook conversation I had with this lady, whose name and photo has been blurred for privacy.

At the same time, this lady added me to a Whatsapp group named 'Subang Rescue', where I once again jokingly volunteered the use of my steering wheel lock if necessary.

And here is the rest of my conversation with the lady on FB.

At the time, we knew had no intention of reporting to Puspa yet, but Puspa had already gotten other leads. For me, the reason why I did not want to report is because most animal rescue shelters are overcrowded, and I'm one of those who'd rather get out there and try to handle the rescue on my own first instead of bugging NGOs to do it, as I presume their hands are already very full. Followers of Puspa would know that people not doing anything while bugging NGOs like MIAR to rescue is very same thing that Puspa complains about a LOT.

As seen above, the invitation to join the investigation was deleted on the FB group, so you won't find it anymore if you're really 'kaypoh' on whether this invitation ever existed.

Note again my comment that I believed Puspa's shelter was full and believed it was better not to burden MIAR.

And from my comments above, I believed it was unlikely that the 'breeder' would give up any dogs or puppies for free as this is uncharacteristic of breeders.  As it turned out, he allowed our group to take away 2 dogs. One took an old and rather weak golden retriever, and one took a mongrel.

And yes, detractors will of course highlight the comment that the GR was in bad condition, but as I already explained before, Uncle Lee had many dogs that are perfectly healthy and in good condition, and a few sick and weak dogs. It doesn't quite make sense to think he's taking good care of some dogs and abusing others, so the logical conclusion is the weak and sick dogs were fairly recently rescued and had not gotten better or could not get much better coz' they were already old.

So what does all this prove?
1) I had no connection to Uncle Lee before the case. That would make me a good neutral witness to the conditions of his place, although as explained earlier I was already expecting to see all the evidence that he's a cruel breeder, which is not neutral at all.

2) For anyone questioning what I have done in terms of rescuing dogs (coz' Puspa's hero worshippers think no one else is as great as her), this goes to show I was doing exactly what she's been telling people to do... Getting out there and doing the work instead of keyboard warrioring away bugging MIAR to go everything. So Puspa should be loving me for doing what she always tells people to do! :-) Of course, this question about what I've done in terms of rescuing animals is nothing more than a rather lame attempt to divert attention away Puspa and make me look less credible. I'm not here to blabber about my dog rescuing credentials, but if you'd like to know, you can ask Dog Lovers from Malaysia group on Facebook and the long - time members there can tell you how annoyingly preachy I can get when it comes to rescuing dogs. 

3) Lee was willing to give up his dogs for adoption, in case you were wondering why he seems to only rescue and does not give away dogs. The main reason why he does not get many adopters is because he doesn't know how to use a computer well, so people only came to him through word of mouth.

So if you want to accuse me of being bias, yes, I was bias. I was bias initially towards Uncle Lee, not to Puspa. And all that changed because the evidence against her claims on him was too much to ignore. And that's how I became his best defense against Puspa.

What do I have to gain from doing all this? Uncle Lee is obviously poor, he can't give me anything except dogs, which I already have enough of. The only thing I hope to gain is justice for this defamed uncle, but more importantly justice for the dogs used for someone's personal benefit.

So those of you hum hawing about wanting to be neutral coz' you don't trust my side of the story, perhaps this will be convince you a little better. And to the ever stubborn detractors/PR bootlickers, you can continue being silly, coz' your attempts to shoot me down are always amusing and I like a little comedy in my life.

My 180 degree turn in the Uncle Lee case